Received: from relay6.UU.NET (relay6.UU.NET [192.48.96.16]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA11218 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 11:01:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay6.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzuce11971; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 11:00:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA15675; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 11:01:04 -0500
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 11:01:04 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <199512141552.KAA16262@bort.mv.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Mark Thompson <mark@fusion.mv.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Parametric Modeling
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status: A
>Is there any plans for LightWave to have this functionality, as far as
>anyone knows?
Can't say.
>Or, better yet, is this a useful feature to the animators
>at large out there?
Its extremely useful, and is one of the highlights of 3DS Max.
And the parameterization is not just limited to modeling. Every aspect
of animation is recorded to a parameterized stack which can be